Be On The Record
BlogSign inSubscribe
HearingsBillsAlerts
← Hearings

Labor and Commerce Subcommittee #2

Thursday, February 26, 2026·1h 34m·▶ Watch / Listen

Virginia's Labor and Commerce Subcommittee #2 advanced six Senate bills spanning franchise non-competes, solar prevailing wages, roofing insurance consumer protections, propane cancellation rights, unemployment lockout exceptions, and expanded civil rights employer thresholds — all reported favorably, with the most contentious debates centering on whether a propane cancellation bill unfairly burdens an entire industry over one bad actor, and whether unlocking unemployment benefits for locked-out workers tips the scales against employers.

Key Actions

·SB240 – Retail Franchise Non-Compete RestrictionsPassed

+ 4 more actions

Controversies

Whether the lockout unemployment exception unfairly subsidizes one side of a labor dispute (SB433)

Andrew Sinclair (Virginia Chamber of Commerce) argued the bill would create a financial subsidy for one side of a private labor dispute paid by the entire business community rather than the employer in the dispute. Senator Suarevel countered that the bill includes three specific exceptions — including when a union refuses to meet under reasonable conditions, violates a collective bargaining agreement, or is found by final NLRA adjudication to have refused to bargain in good faith — and concluded 'So it's not exactly a unilateral tipping of the playing field.'

+ 2 more controversies

Notable Quotes

“The issue of attorney's fees and cost is complicated. We go by the American rule, not the English rule. So we don't get attorneys fees unless it's in the contract. And I can assure you that Amerigas contracts are contracts of adhesion, and they do not allow for that. How many people can pay a lawyer five or $10,000 to go sue over a propane tank?”

Senator Stuart, bill patron — Senator Stuart was rebutting the suggestion from Delegate Ballard that propane consumers who cannot get their tanks removed or propane refunded could simply sue for breach of contract, arguing that the cost barrier makes litigation impractical for most consumers.

+ 4 more quotes

Votes

Move the substitute for SB240Passed
Move SB240 as substitute to report to full committeePassed
Move the substitute for SB758Passed
Move the line 26 amendment to SB758 (changing 'no less than' to 'greater than 5 megawatts')Passed
Move to report SB758 substitute as amended and refer to Committee on AppropriationsPassed
Move the substitute for SB402Passed
Move SB402 with substitute to reportPassed
Move the Runyon enactment clause amendment to SB459 [bill number UNCLEAR] (nothing in this act shall be construed to alter, modify, or impair any contract entered into, extended, or modified on or before July 1, 2026)Passed
Move SB459 [bill number UNCLEAR] as amended to AppropriationsPassed
Move to report SB433Passed
Move to report SB637Passed
Unlock the full summary

Subscribe to see all key actions, controversies, quotes, and what's next.

Sign in to subscribe
TranscriptPreview
We are going to go at ease for a bit. I am. We do not know when we're going to have our Senate patrons here. I appreciate that. We do have to wait for some folks and so I apologize. We will go at ease at this point and come back as soon as possible. Thank you. Report any announcements on the Deaths today, Thursday, February 26th, the committee we're going to do a few of the bills that have identical, identical, you know, cognates or I just repeated myself, identical bills that pass out of the House. And we're going to have the patrons of those bills who are familiar with the current amendments, the current status of each of the pieces of legislation present the bills. So with that we're going to actually have for SB240 we're going to have Delegate Helmer present the bill on retail franchise agreements that passed out of labor and Commerce 20 to nothing and passed out of the House 97 to nothing. With that, Delegate Helmer, thank you Mr. Chair. As you said, Mr. Chair, SB 240 is the cognate of my retail franchise agreement governing law, competition, restrictions. In discussions with…
Continue reading

Subscribe to unlock the full transcript, summary, and search across all Virginia committee hearings.

Sign in to subscribe