Be On The Record
BlogSign inSubscribe
HearingsBillsAlerts
← Hearings

Public Safety Subcommittee #2

Thursday, February 12, 2026·1h 34m·▶ Watch / Listen

Virginia's Public Safety Subcommittee #2 advanced bills on parole guidelines, cyber National Guard deployment, disaster preparedness, and DOC death investigations while carrying over contested measures on fire marshal law enforcement authority and a Police Chief Bill of Rights to 2027. The session's sharpest divide emerged over HB 1388, where the Municipal League argued police chiefs must follow local governing body policy while Delegate Cherry and law enforcement groups contended political interference in policing is a real and documented problem.

Key Actions

·HB 1030 – Parole Board Scoring GuidelinesNo Vote

+ 10 more actions

Controversies

HB 1388 – Whether police chiefs should be insulated from local governing body policy direction

Mark Flynn (Municipal League) argued that under the bill's language prohibiting policy disagreement alone as just cause for removal, a police chief could refuse to end practices like pretextual stops even if the governing body wanted them stopped, and that chiefs — unlike rank-and-file officers — must reflect the policy of the elected body. Delegate Cherry countered that Flynn's testimony actually solidified why the bill is necessary, stating that departments are operating policies in contradiction to what the General Assembly has told them they should do.

+ 3 more controversies

Notable Quotes

“We actually did a study for genius parole decisions a few years ago, and we know that there's very few pathways to parole in Virginia. And for those who do qualify, the vast majority are denied. And we actually did direct to content analysis of the stated official reasons why those denials were happening. And the vast majority of those reasons are not connected to the research on public safety and the reality that as individuals age, their risk of offending plummets.”

Stephen Keener, criminology professor, Christopher Newport University — Keener testified in favor of HB 1030, which would create a scoring process and guidelines for the Parole Board when considering inmates eligible for geriatric and pre-abolition parole.

+ 2 more quotes

Votes

Report HB 1421 with substitutePassed
Report HB 1030 with substitutePassed
Carry over HB 1315 under Rule 22 to 2027 (Delegate Webert stated intent to vote no)No Vote
No (1)Delegate Webert (stated intent)
Carry over HB 1388 under Rule 22 to 2027 (Delegate Webert stated intent to vote no)No Vote
No (1)Delegate Webert (stated intent)
Unlock the full summary

Subscribe to see all key actions, controversies, quotes, and what's next.

Sign in to subscribe
TranscriptPreview
It's. The Public safety. Subcommittee number two, come to order. Clerk shall take the roll, please. Clerk shall close the roll and a quorum is present. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to the final meeting of this side of crossover. For the subcommittee number two, we have a number of bills that'll close. Close us out here in the docket. First, we will take up House Bill 1030. Delegate Wilt. Delegate Wilt, Good morning. Morning, Mr. Chairman, committee members, I believe you have a substitute. A substitute is before us made a proper second. Without objection, the substitute is adopted. Delegate wilt, thank you, Mr. Chairman, committee members, so what. This bill may seem a little long, but so for years, I'm sure we've all heard about concerns about the Parole board and issuing parole or not. And so what this bill attempts to do is create a set of guidelines for the Parole board to use. Now, I hope we're not extending parole. That's set what it is, but it affects those folks that are eligible for parole, you know, the ones before the law changed, geriatric parole. So that's. That's the over the overall idea of the bill. And…
Continue reading

Subscribe to unlock the full transcript, summary, and search across all Virginia committee hearings.

Sign in to subscribe