Be On The Record
BlogSign inSubscribe
HearingsBillsAlerts
← Hearings

Senate Business, Labor, & Technology

Tuesday, February 24, 2026·1h 16m·▶ Watch / Listen

The Senate Business, Labor, & Technology Committee unanimously advanced SB26-051, which would require age attestation on computing devices, despite sharp testimony from child safety advocates, parents of deceased children, and tech critics who argued the bill's self-attestation system is easily manipulated and may give parents a false sense of security.

Key Actions

·SB26-051 – Age Attestation on Computing DevicesPassed

Controversies

Whether self-attestation effectively protects children

Senator Ball argued the bill represents a meaningful protective step modeled on California's unanimously passed AB 1043. Kim Osterman directly countered that the bill 'is enshrining into law a failed system of allowing users to self attest their own age,' and Morgan Hedrick testified from personal experience that 'Kids over 13 will not benefit from this. They will manipulate around the guardrails.'

+ 5 more controversies

Notable Quotes

“You can take your kid to the zoo and you know, they're going to see animals. You can take your kid to a Broncos game, they're going to see a game. You take your kid to the Internet and it's the whole Internet. And I do think that what we have learned from the rise of social media is that the status quo, which is doing nothing, is not productive and not good for kids.”

Senator Matt Ball — Senator Ball, the bill's sponsor, made this argument in his closing statement to explain why Colorado needs to act on child online safety even if the bill is imperfect.

+ 4 more quotes

Votes

Amendment L001 to SB26-051 (clarifying bill does not apply to HCPF)Passed
SB26-051 as amended to the committee of the whole with a favorable recommendationPassed
Yes (5)Marc Catlin, Iman Jodeh, Larry Liston, Nick Hinrichsen, Jessie Danielson
Place SB26-051 on the consent calendarPassed
Yes (5)Marc Catlin, Iman Jodeh, Larry Liston, Nick Hinrichsen, Jessie Danielson
Unlock the full summary

Subscribe to see all key actions, controversies, quotes, and what's next.

Sign in to subscribe
TranscriptPreview
It. But I also like to come here because. Foreign. My name is Raven I am here today as a mother and advocate Whether. Two years ago my own family established practice a very unfortunate situation in which. Out of respect for anyone's privacy and also because there are time for system as a children are brave enough to stay true the currents must not hesitate. Institutions must not pass Processes must not compare. As an engineer who understands validate best practices I believe that standards are executed. Standards create consistency, standards assured color there is. I understand that. Fortunately but man. The purpose of this road is not to withstand harbor nor is it to create a country. It establishes procedural and procedural safeguards. It ensures that when it runs and snows to define the process it strengthens consistency and accountability. It lead divorce's trust by making execution it is the delivery extraordinary. Responsible system. It's. Okay, folks. Welcome back. We are moving on to Senate Bill 51. Welcome sponsors, please tell us about your bills. Senator Ball thank you, Madam Chair, and thank you members of the committee. I'm happy to be here in front of the committee…
Continue reading

Subscribe to unlock the full transcript, summary, and search across all Colorado committee hearings.

Sign in to subscribe