Be On The Record
BlogSign inSubscribe
HearingsBillsAlerts
← Hearings

Review and Comment Hearing for Initiative #286

Wednesday, April 1, 2026·8m·▶ Watch / Listen

A review and comment hearing on proposed Initiative #286 — which would amend the Colorado Constitution to establish a fundamental right of access to public proceedings and records, and impose a civil penalty of at least $1,000 per knowing violation on state or local governments — produced no votes but surfaced unresolved legal questions about individual vs. entity liability, sovereign immunity, and the proper party for enforcement suits.

Key Actions

·Initiative #286 – Right to Access Public Proceedings and RecordsNo Vote

Controversies

Scope of permissible withholding of government information under paragraph two of the stated purposes

John Caldera argued that paragraph two of the stated purposes 'seems to indicate there's only one situation in which information can be withheld or the affairs of government to be protected' and stated 'that's not the case,' indicating disagreement with how the staff memorandum characterized the scope of permissible withholding under the initiative.

+ 1 more controversy

Notable Quotes

“The purpose of the statutory requirement of the directors of Legislative council staff and the Office of Legislative Legal Services is to provide comments and questions intended to aid designated representatives and the proponents they represent in determining the language of their proposal and to avail the public of the contents of the proposal.”

Julia Jackson — Jackson explained the purpose of the review and comment hearing process at the outset of the proceeding.

+ 3 more quotes

Unlock the full summary

Subscribe to see all key actions, controversies, quotes, and what's next.

Sign in to subscribe
TranscriptPreview
I will call to order the review and comment hearing for proposed Initiative 2526, number 286, concerning the right to access public proceedings and records. I will have everybody in the room go around and introduce themselves. My name is Julia Jackson with Legislative Council staff. Rebecca Bayetti with the Office of Legislative Legal Services. John Caldera, proponent. Shane Madsen, counsel for proponents. Beth Hendricks, proponent. Thanks so much. Section 140, 105.1, Colorado Revised Statutes requires to initiative. I did. Oh, we did. Sorry. So sorry. Requires the directors of the legislative council staff and the office of Legislative Legal Services to quote, review and comment on initiative petitions for proposed laws and amendments to the Colorado Constitution. We hereby submit our comments and questions to you regarding the appended proposed initiative which is before you in this memo. The purpose of the statutory requirement of the directors of Legislative council staff and the Office of Legislative Legal Services is to provide comments and questions intended to aid designated representatives and the proponents they represent in determining the language of their proposal and to avail the public of the contents of the proposal. Our first objective is to be sure…
Continue reading

Subscribe to unlock the full transcript, summary, and search across all Colorado committee hearings.

Sign in to subscribe