← Hearings
Senate Transportation & Energy
Senators fast-tracked a narrow plastics-disposal fix to the consent calendar, then spent the bulk of the hearing tangling over the boundaries of the Front Range Passenger Rail District — where a member-sponsored amendment carved the city of North Glenn out of the taxing district over the sponsors' objection before the bill advanced to Appropriations.
Key Actions
·Disposal of Preproduction Plastic MaterialsPassed
+ 1 more action
Notable Quotes
“So we just did a teeny tiny fix to clarify that. And that's what this bill is, very, very narrow bill just to clarify that they do not have to go to a hazardous waste site.”
+ 6 more quotes
Votes
Referred to Committee of the Whole and with a recommendation that it be placed on the consent calendarAction
Yes (9)Mark Baisley, Marc Catlin, Tony Exum, William Lindstedt, Kyle Mullica, Rod Pelton, Matt Ball, Lisa Cutter, Tom Sullivan
Referred to Committee on AppropriationsAction
Yes (8)Lisa Cutter, Matt Ball, Marc Catlin, William Lindstedt, Tom Sullivan, Tony Exum, Kyle Mullica, Rod Pelton
No (1)Mark Baisley
Unlock the full summary
Subscribe to see every key action, the full discussion, amendments, and notable quotes.
Sign in to subscribeTranscriptPreview
Good afternoon. Senate Transportation and Energy Committee will now come to order. Ms. Forbes, can you please call the roll? Senators basley. Present. Catlin. Here. Exum. Good afternoon. Linstedt. Malika. Pelton. R. The good pelton is here. Sullivan. Here. Mr. Vice chair. Excused. And madam chair? Present. Okay. We. Oh, We will be hearing Senate Bill 171 first, which I'm sponsoring. So I will turn it over to my vice chair. It. May the roll reflect that Senator Ball is now present. Our first bill Today, Senate Bill 171. Senator Cutter, please tell us about your bill. Thank you, Mr. Chair. This bill you actually may remember hearing about the original disposal of pre production plastic materials way, way, way these many weeks ago when the bill's been signed and we realized someone caught that there was something in the bill that could be misinterpreted to indicate that all the plastic materials that we were preventing from being discharged into the environment would have to be taken to a hazardous waste system site. And that was not true. We didn't want to, you know, have people think that and have to worry about where they disposed of them. So we…
Continue reading
Subscribe to unlock the full transcript, summary, and search across all Colorado committee hearings.
Sign in to subscribe